Friday, August 15, 2014

Virginia Assault Lawyers Prince William Battery Evidence

Virginia Simple Assault Lawyers

In Virginia, simple assault is a criminal offense punishable under Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-57 and is punishable as a Class 1 misdemeanor

Below is a sample case of simple assault in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.

Have you been charged with simple assault in Virginia and need a lawyer to defend you? 

Are you concerned about the consequences of being charged with simple assault in Virginia?

Under Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-57,

"A. Any person who commits a simple assault or assault and battery is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor, and if the person intentionally selects the person against whom a simple assault is committed because of his race, religious conviction, color or national origin, the penalty upon conviction shall include a term of confinement of at least six months, 30 days of which shall be a mandatory minimum term of confinement…."

For a lot of our clients, simple assault can result in the loss of their job, their security clearance or even their immigration status.

Don’t risk going to court without a lawyer, if you have been charged with simple assault in Virginia.  Contact our law firm for help and speak with a lawyer today.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Baker v. Commonwealth

Facts:

Defendant challenged a judgment of the Circuit Court of Prince William (Virginia), which convicted him of breaking and entering with the intent to commit assault and battery in violation of Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-91.

If you are facing a criminal case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • An appellate court must consider the evidence and all reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, as the prevailing party below. That standard requires the appellate court to regard as true all the credible evidence favorable to the Commonwealth and all fair inferences to be drawn therefrom.
  • When considering the sufficiency of the evidence on appeal, a reviewing court does not ask itself whether it believes that the evidence at the trial established guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, as the appellate court must when it was the prevailing party in the trial court, it must instead ask whether any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. This familiar standard gives full play to the responsibility of the trier of fact fairly to resolve conflicts in the testimony, to weigh the evidence, and to draw reasonable inferences from basic facts to ultimate facts.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Email Us:

First Name:
Last Name:
Email @:
Phone #: --
Message:

Our Phone #

Prince William Virginia

Prince William 703-278-0405
Click here to call us toll free Sris Lawyer Click here to call us toll free
Powered by Blogger.

Popular Posts

Social Icons